<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Authors Guild, unbelievably, still after Kindle 2</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cultureofownership.org/?feed=rss2&#038;p=50" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cultureofownership.org/?p=50</link>
	<description>Thoughts on technology and intellectual property. AND KITTIES!!!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 16:19:02 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: gconnery</title>
		<link>http://cultureofownership.org/?p=50&#038;cpage=1#comment-3715</link>
		<dc:creator>gconnery</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 02:36:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cultureofownership.org/?p=50#comment-3715</guid>
		<description>While I think the author&#039;s guild has no case to make here, I don&#039;t understand why everybody keeps referring to the quality of the current Kindle text to speech.  Obviously, that will keep getting better at some rate we can&#039;t predict.  And yes eventually it&#039;ll be perfectly tolerable for extended periods.  

But that has nothing to do with whether this is fair use or not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While I think the author&#8217;s guild has no case to make here, I don&#8217;t understand why everybody keeps referring to the quality of the current Kindle text to speech.  Obviously, that will keep getting better at some rate we can&#8217;t predict.  And yes eventually it&#8217;ll be perfectly tolerable for extended periods.  </p>
<p>But that has nothing to do with whether this is fair use or not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: royterp</title>
		<link>http://cultureofownership.org/?p=50&#038;cpage=1#comment-3710</link>
		<dc:creator>royterp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 20:14:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cultureofownership.org/?p=50#comment-3710</guid>
		<description>Not surprisingly, Roy Blount and the Authors Guild don&#039;t speak for all authors. Check out Neil Gaiman&#039;s short but sweet summary of his discussion with his agent about the kerfuffle.
http://journal.neilgaiman.com/2009/02/quick-argument-summary.html
And Wil Wheaton agrees:
http://twitter.com/wilw/statuses/1255034323
I don&#039;t know how the Authors Guild works, but hopefully more authors will see the error of the Guild&#039;s position and work to correct it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not surprisingly, Roy Blount and the Authors Guild don&#8217;t speak for all authors. Check out Neil Gaiman&#8217;s short but sweet summary of his discussion with his agent about the kerfuffle.<br />
<a href="http://journal.neilgaiman.com/2009/02/quick-argument-summary.html" rel="nofollow">http://journal.neilgaiman.com/2009/02/quick-argument-summary.html</a><br />
And Wil Wheaton agrees:<br />
<a href="http://twitter.com/wilw/statuses/1255034323" rel="nofollow">http://twitter.com/wilw/statuses/1255034323</a><br />
I don&#8217;t know how the Authors Guild works, but hopefully more authors will see the error of the Guild&#8217;s position and work to correct it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anstett</title>
		<link>http://cultureofownership.org/?p=50&#038;cpage=1#comment-3709</link>
		<dc:creator>anstett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 21:48:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cultureofownership.org/?p=50#comment-3709</guid>
		<description>What happened to fair use?

I have the digital item. I should be able to use that item in any manner I see fit for my own personal use. 

Huge difference in using text to speech as public performance art and using it to put your child to sleep at night. 

BOB</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What happened to fair use?</p>
<p>I have the digital item. I should be able to use that item in any manner I see fit for my own personal use. </p>
<p>Huge difference in using text to speech as public performance art and using it to put your child to sleep at night. </p>
<p>BOB</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mors_d</title>
		<link>http://cultureofownership.org/?p=50&#038;cpage=1#comment-3708</link>
		<dc:creator>mors_d</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 20:59:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cultureofownership.org/?p=50#comment-3708</guid>
		<description>Do you mean text-to-speech? I&#039;ve always thought of speech-to-text as dictation.

I have to agree that it seems silly (if not pointless) for this to be a problem, especially after having heard the Kindle2&#039;s text-to-speech engine. However, this sort of behaviour does seem to creep out of industry groups when they develop a sense of self-interest and realise that as a lobby group they have to power to do something about it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do you mean text-to-speech? I&#8217;ve always thought of speech-to-text as dictation.</p>
<p>I have to agree that it seems silly (if not pointless) for this to be a problem, especially after having heard the Kindle2&#8217;s text-to-speech engine. However, this sort of behaviour does seem to creep out of industry groups when they develop a sense of self-interest and realise that as a lobby group they have to power to do something about it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
